Saturday, March 10, 2007

W.Post The right answer!

It has to be Mr. Castañeda who had to speak in the Post about Bush's trip into Latin America. It's certainly clear that any of the visited countries has an agenda to be enforced, but the bigger picture is Chavez.

Castro's best pupil has been doing his homework, while the Foreign Service might have not. What was being discussed in the US while Hugo Chavez's apparatus took complete control of oil companies, nationalising them? The answer is Iraq, a bloody big problem, for sure, but still not the only one.

One thing Clinton did not assume as President of the USA is that America had to keep the world spinning, as far as it could. Bush had to assume that responsibility, specially after 9/11, but has been looking the way he was told to: Middle East.

In the meantime, we’ve passed from one communist-lead prison (not just an island, Cuba), to several red areas all over Latin America. The picture is getting to worse while countries like Guatemala or Bolivia complete their path onto totalitarian states, which power, sooner or later, will enter in conflict with their non-communist neighbours. And that domino has a key trigger: Venezuela’s resources. When he’s taken off the seat, most of those nations that have made the mistake of picking communist leaders for themselves, will turn to a healthier system.

In the Americas, Communism has found a powerful use of nationalist ideas (always present there) and has successfully built a religion around “indigenous population”. The lies planted in the poor people’s brain by misguided Jesuits and other orders, close to the Liberation Theology, and the Vatican’s incapacity to stop them, under John Paul II. That’s why Castro reigns today from his bed of death. He reigns on the hopeless. And nobody cares in the Beltway.

No comments: